Evidence Hub

How Common Are Auditory Manifestations in Vestibular Migraine? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Petre AM, Costin R, Anghel I

2026

1,967 participants

Abstract

Abstract Objective To estimate the prevalence and characterise the clinical significance of auditory manifestations in adults with definite or probable vestibular migraine. Methods PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Patient-level prevalence data were pooled using random-effects models with logit-transformed proportions. Hearing loss and hyperacusis were synthesised narratively when quantitative pooling was inappropriate. Results Fifteen studies were included. Twelve studies (n = 1,967) contributed to the aural-fullness meta-analysis and 13 (n = 1,887) to the tinnitus meta-analysis. Pooled prevalence was 28.8% for aural fullness (95% CI, 19.8–40.0%; I² = 95.3%) and 40.7% for tinnitus (95% CI, 30.3–52.0%; I² = 94.7%). Hearing-loss definitions were too heterogeneous for pooling, and evidence for hyperacusis remained limited. Conclusion Aural fullness and tinnitus are common in vestibular migraine, but substantial heterogeneity limits precise prevalence estimation. Standardised auditory assessment is needed to improve phenotyping and differential diagnosis.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,967 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free