Evidence Hub

GPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 responses to common migraine questions: a cross-sectional comparative study of accuracy, completeness, empathy, readability and safety

Elbeyli AB, Kır HH

2026

Abstract

Abstract Background People increasingly use large language models to obtain health information. Migraine is common, but some symptoms may overlap with stroke and other secondary headache disorders. We compared the answers given by GPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 to common migraine questions, with attention to accuracy, completeness, empathy, readability and clinical safety. Methods In this cross-sectional comparative study, 100 patient-facing questions were compiled from Google Trends, the public r/migraine community on Reddit, and patient information resources. Each question was submitted unchanged to GPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 in separate sessions. Two neurologists, blinded to model identity, independently rated accuracy, completeness and empathy on 1–5 scales and safety on a 0–5 structured rubric. The Ateşman readability score was calculated once from each response. Exact agreement and quadratic-weighted kappa were used for inter-rater agreement. Question-level mean ratings were compared with paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, with Holm correction. Results Exact agreement ranged from 88% to 96%, and quadratic-weighted kappa values ranged from 0.810 to 0.920. DeepSeek-V3 had higher accuracy scores than GPT-4o (4.54 ± 0.49 vs 4.37 ± 0.50; Holm-adjusted p = 0.026), higher completeness scores (3.98 ± 0.44 vs 3.46 ± 0.61; adjusted p

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free