Evidence Hub

A Large-Scale Epidemiological Survey of Migraine Among School-Age Children and Adolescents in Southern Zhejiang and Northern Fujian, China: Prevalence, Clinical Profiles, and Risk Factors

Zhou Q, Shi J, Yu F, Sun R, Yang Z, Shao B, Wang H

2026

Abstract

Abstract Objective To determine the prevalence, demographic distribution, attack characteristics, disease burden, and associated factors of migraine among school-aged children and adolescents in China. Methods This cross-sectional survey employed a stratified multistage random cluster sampling design across 26 schools in southern Zhejiang and northern Fujian. A validated structured questionnaire was administered on-site; suspected cases were independently diagnosed by two senior headache neurologists using ICHD-3 criteria and the Diagnostic Criteria for Vestibular Migraine of Childhood (VMC). Of 8,000 distributed questionnaires, 7,384 were valid (92.30% response rate; mean age 14.65 years). Chi-square tests, binary logistic regression, and multivariate logistic regression were used for analyses. Results The overall migraine prevalence was 7.04% (520/7,384). Vestibular migraine accounted for 1.63%, migraine with aura 1.19%, and migraine without aura 4.22%. Prevalence was significantly higher in females than males (9.06% vs. 5.15%, P 10 years (11.35%). Among migraineurs, most had 4–15 attack days/month (67.12%), 2–24 h duration (92.50%), and moderate pain (VAS 4–6, 76.92%). Over the preceding 3 months, mean academic impact was 4.38 days, headache-related leave was 1.42 days, missed social/leisure activities was 1.62 days, and family escort was 1.31 days—all showing a senior high > junior high > primary school gradient. Only 42.88% had ever sought medical care, and 37.31% were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free