Evidence Hub

Exploring Proximal and Distal Ultrasound-Guided Greater Occipital Nerve Block Approaches in Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sabet H, Samir A, Lashin B, Abbas A, Ramadan S, El-Moslemani M, Younis AF, Yousef O et al.

Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2026

658 participants

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of proximal and distal ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve block (US-GONB) in patients with migraine.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to July 2025. Studies assessing US-GONB in migraine were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and expressed as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the injection site.

Results: Twelve studies (658 patients) were included. US-GONB significantly reduced pain intensity (MD = -3.48 points, 95% CI [-3.84, -3.11]), monthly headache frequency (MD = -9.12 days, 95% CI [-11.65, -6.58]), headache duration (MD = -18.98 h, 95% CI [-26.86, -11.11]), and monthly analgesic use (MD = -10.01, 95% CI [-12.91, -7.11]). No significant subgroup difference was observed in pain intensity between injection sites. For monthly headache frequency, a significant subgroup difference was observed, with the proximal subgroup demonstrating numerically larger reductions than the distal subgroup (-10.83 vs. -6.36 days; p = 0.006). Adverse events were generally mild and transient: loss of pinprick sensation occurred in 80% of proximal vs. 100% of distal injections, dizziness in 22.7% vs. 3.9%, moderate-to-severe migraine attacks in 20.1% vs. 12.9%, and cerebellar-like symptoms in 12.5% vs. 0%, respectively. Vasovagal syncope (9.1%) and local pain (8.1%) were reported only in proximal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 658 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free