Evidence Hub

Digital Assessment of Objective and Patient-Reported Cognition Across Migraine Phases: Results from the MIND Cohort

Khorsand B, Teichrow D, Jicha CJ, Minen MT, Seng E, Lipton RB, Ezzati A

2026

139 participants

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

Objective: Migraine attacks are frequently accompanied by patient-reported “subjective” cognitive symptoms, but objective findings have been inconsistent. We used high-frequency, smartphone-based cognitive testing to assess within-person changes in subjective and objective cognition across migraine phases using daily diaries.

Methods: Adults with migraine were recruited through social media. Eligible participants met ICHD-3 migraine criteria and had 3 to 22 monthly headache days. For 30 days, they completed daily smartphone-based reports on headache features, cognitive symptoms, and three smartphone-based objective cognitive tasks. Objective tests included Symbol Search (processing speed/visual search), Color Dots (visual working memory/attention), and Grid Memory (visuospatial working memory). Primary analyses contrasted assessments on current headache days (ictal) versus days with no headache (nonictal). When possible, non-ictal days were subclassified using information from adjacent days as pre-ictal, post-ictal, and interictal days. Outcomes included subjective cognition, reaction time (mean across correctly scored trials), accuracy, and a speed-accuracy composite (Reaction Time/Accuracy). Mixed-effects models adjusted for age, sex, and practice effects.

Results: The 139 eligible participants (84.9% female; mean age 38.2 years) contributed 3,014 person-days for ictal versus nonictal comparisons (2,097 nonictal; 917 ictal); for 1,828 person-days precise phase…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 139 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free