Evidence Hub

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in the Prevention of High-Frequency Episodic and Chronic Migraine in Romania-A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study

Ciubotaru A, Vamanu A, Grosu C, Constantinescu V, Ignat EB, Cucu LE, Alexa D, Mastaleru A et al.

Biomedicines, 2026

113 participants

Abstract

Background: Real-world evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies in Eastern European populations remains limited. We aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes and safety in Romanian patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM). Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational cohort study including 113 adults with HFEM (n = 38) or CM (n = 75) who initiated treatment with galcanezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, or eptinezumab at specialized headache centers in Romania. Monthly migraine days (MMDs) in HFEM and monthly headache days (MHDs) in CM were assessed at the baseline and during follow-up. Treatment outcomes, discontinuation, persistence, and adverse events were evaluated during routine clinical follow-up. Results: At month 6, headache frequency was substantially reduced in both groups, with median MMDs decreasing from 10 to 2 in patients with HFEM and median MHDs decreasing from 25 to 6 in patients with CM. A ≥50% reduction in headache frequency was achieved by 78.9% of patients with HFEM and 64.0% of those with CM. Among the patients with CM, 70.7% met the predefined criterion for conversion to episodic migraine at month 6. During follow-up, 22 patients discontinued treatment. Adverse events were reported in 28 patients (24.8%), were predominantly non-serious, and resulted in treatment discontinuation in 3 patients (2.7%). No serious adverse events were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 113 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free