Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of atogepant in migraine with and without medication overuse: Pooled real-world analysis of two independent clinical cohorts

De Luca M, Ferraù L, Adragna MS, Cafarchio A, Grugno R, Vita G, Lo Presti R, Cosenza D et al.

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026

78 participants

Abstract

Background: Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is common in treatment-resistant chronic migraine and may complicate preventive management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term effectiveness of atogepant 60 mg once daily in a pooled real-world population of patients with migraine, including treatment-resistant chronic migraine, and to explore whether baseline MOH influenced treatment response.

Methods: This pooled observational study combined two independent real-world cohorts of patients treated with atogepant 60 mg once daily for migraine prevention. The database included 78 patients, with short-term follow-up recorded at 12 weeks in one cohort and at 3 months in the other. Monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly symptomatic medication use, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), and treatment documentation were harmonized. Effectiveness was analyzed in the pooled population, while exploratory comparisons were performed according to baseline medication-overuse headache (MOH) status.

Results: The pooled database included 78 patients, and paired MMD measurements were available for 73. Median MMD decreased from 13.0 [10.0-20.0] to 4.0 [3.0-8.0], with a median reduction of 7.0 [6.0-11.0] days/month (p < 0.001). A reduction of at least 50% was achieved by 54/73 patients (74.0%). MIDAS, HIT-6, and monthly symptomatic medication use also improved significantly (all p < 0.001). MOH status was available for 77 patients: 24 had MOH and 53…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 78 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free