Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Prophylactic Antibacterials in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Qiu-Ying Yu, Zi-Yang Wu, Qinggang Ge, Zhong-Hua Zhang, Suo-Di Zhai

Critical Care Medicine, 2026

5,562 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have shown that selective decontamination of the digestive tract can reduce the incidence and mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in mechanically ventilated patients. However, the prophylactic role of IV antibacterials, one of its essential components, remains unclear. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic prophylactic use of antibacterials in mechanically ventilated patients.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library from inception to November 30, 2025.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating prophylactic use of systemic antibacterials in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICUs were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4, and the quality of the evidence was evaluated using the recommended Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Eleven RCTs with 5562 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that the systemic prophylactic use of antibacterials probably reduces the incidence of VAP (relative risk [RR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.77; moderate certainty) and the incidence of early VAP (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41-0.66; moderate certainty), but probably does not reduce in-hospital mortality (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.68-1.06; moderate certainty) or duration…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,562 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free