A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of open oesophagectomy and hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy
Abstract
Introduction Surgical resection, with or without neoadjuvant therapy, remains the primary treatment for oesophageal cancer. The two main surgical approaches are open oesophagectomy (OE) and hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy (HMIE). However, their relative safety and efficacy remain controversial. This review aims to compare perioperative and postoperative complications between OE and HMIE in the management of oesophageal cancer. Methods Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. Odds ratios (OR), standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for statistical analysis. Results Eight studies involving 6,053 patients were included. HMIE was associated significantly with lower rates of conduit necrosis (risk ratio (RR)=3.54, 95% CI [1.07, 11.73]; p=0.04), postoperative pneumonia (RR=1.29, 95% CI [1.05, 1.57]; p=0.01) and recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RR=2.51, 95% CI [1.13, 5.55]; p=0.02). No significant differences were observed in Clavien–Dindo complication grades IIIa–IVb (RR=1.13, 95% CI [0.92, 1.38]; p=0.24), grade V complications (RR=1.03, 95% CI [0.30, 3.51]; p=0.96), bleeding, inhospital mortality, 90-day mortality, duration of surgery, hospital stay or intensive care unit stay. Although not statistically significant, OE was associated with fewer cases of anastomotic and chyle leaks. Conclusions Both OE and HMIE have distinct advantages and drawbacks. HMIE appears superior…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 6,053 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Penicillins for Treatment of Pneumococcal Pneumonia: Does In Vitro Resistance Really Matter?
- Thiophenes—Naturally Occurring Plant Metabolites: Biological Activities and In Silico Evaluation of Their Potential as Cathepsin D Inhibitors
- Inhalable Mannosylated Rifampicin–Curcumin Co-Loaded Nanomicelles with Enhanced In Vitro Antimicrobial Efficacy for an Optimized Pulmonary Tuberculosis Therapy
- Development and validation of microbial bioassay for quantification of Levofloxacin in pharmaceutical preparations
- GC-MS Analysis and Biomedical Therapy of Oil from n-Hexane Fraction of Scutellaria edelbergii Rech. f.: In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico Approach
- Propranolol, chlorpromazine and diclofenac restore susceptibility of extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-Acinetobacter baumannii to fluoroquinolones
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.