Evidence Hub

Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials to Evaluate the Incidence of Pneumonia, Upper Respiratory Tract Infections and Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Isatuximab

Thura Win Htut, M. Win, M. Han, K. Thein

Blood, 2023

600 participants

Abstract

Introduction

Multiple myeloma is a cancer of plasma cell and accounts for approximately 13% of all haematologic malignancies. Isatuximab is an anti CD38 IgG1 monoclonal antibody which binds to and kills myeloma cells through antibody-dependent cellular-mediated cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, and direct induction of apoptosis. The incorporation of isatuximab to standard treatment in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) has shown to significantly improve efficacy, with notable toxicities. We performed a combined analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to determine the risk of pneumonia and upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) and febrile neutropenia in patients with RRMM treated with isatuximab.

Methods

We systematically conducted a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE databases and meeting abstracts from inception through June 30 th, 2023. Phase III RCTs utilizing isatuximab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma that mention pneumonia, URTIs and febrile neutropenia as adverse effects were incorporated in the analysis. Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method was used to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q- statistic. Random effects model was applied.

Results

A total of 600 patients with RRMM from 2 phase III RCTs (ICARIA-MM and IKEMA) were eligible. ICARIA-MM and IKEMA…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 600 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free