Evidence Hub

Migraine and the risk of dementia: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Jiang W, Liang GH, Li JA, Yu P, Dong M

Aging clinical and experimental research, 2022

291,549 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the correlation between migraine and the risk of dementia.

METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched systematically. We selected cohort studies (prospective and retrospective) and case-control studies that reported migraine in patients with dementia, including vascular dementia. The pooled effects were analyzed to evaluate relative risk with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS: In total, nine studies (two case-control and seven cohort studies) including 291,549 individuals were identified. These studies indicated that people with migraine (relative risk = 1.33; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-1.53) have an increased risk of all-cause dementia. Additionally, the pooled results of four studies showed that migraine is associated with an increased risk of vascular dementia (relative risk = 1.85; 95% confidence interval: 1.22-2.81; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS: Data from observational studies suggest that migraine may be a risk factor for dementia, particularly vascular dementia. More studies are warranted to explore the association between migraine and dementia and the potential common pathophysiological mechanisms.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 291,549 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free