Evidence Hub

Migraine and the risk of cervical artery dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sun Z, Kleine-Borgmann J, Suh J, McDermott GC, Vishnevetsky A, Rist PM

European stroke journal, 2023

9,857 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Migraine is a common, disabling chronic pain condition possibly related to changes in endothelial and vascular structure and function. Several observational studies have suggested an elevated risk of cervical artery dissection (CeAD) in patients with a history of migraine. We aimed to investigate this potential association using systematic review and meta-analytic methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We utilized a pre-defined search protocol to identify and screen studies related to migraine and CeAD in PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science Core Collection. We assessed the risk of bias and performed a meta-analysis of selected studies to assess the association between migraine and CeAD. We also performed subgroup analyses by migraine subtype, biological sex, and the use of stroke versus non-stroke controls.

RESULTS: We identified 11 studies (N = 9857 patients) for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed an association between migraine and CeAD with an odds ratio of 1.74 (95%CI 1.38-2.19). There was high heterogeneity among the included studies (I2 = 61%). Publication bias was present but the Trim-Fill imputation suggested that the impact on results was likely minimal. Subgroup analyses revealed an association between migraine without aura and CeAD (OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.55-2.24) but not migraine with aura and CeAD (OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.71-1.88). There was no difference in the association between migraine and CeAD in men compared to women.

DISCUSSION AND…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 9,857 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free