Evidence Hub

Effectiveness and influence of mindfulness-based intervention on migraine patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Liao YC, Chen WS, Restya WPD, Liao YC, Lin YC, Lin RT

Journal of psychosomatic research, 2025

1,027 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

Migraines are among the top causes of global disability and are often managed with pharmacological treatments, which may produce adverse effects. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have emerged as promising non-pharmacological approaches, yet existing studies report mixed findings. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify the effectiveness of MBIs in improving pain, psychological, and functional outcomes among adults with migraine.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults (≥18 years) with a clinical diagnosis of migraine. Four databases-Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and ProQuest Central-were searched from 1982 to July 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Meta-analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software Version 4 and R.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs with 1027 participants were included. MBIs were associated with significant reductions in pain intensity (standardized mean difference: 0.23 [95 % CI: 0.11-0.35]) and pain frequency (0.33 [0.11-0.54]), as well as improvements in quality of life (0.24 [0.08-0.40]). Psychological outcomes improved significantly, including anxiety (0.37 [0.14-0.61]), depression (0.26 [0.06-0.45]), and pain catastrophizing (0.57 [0.35-0.80]). No significant effects were found for activity-related disability (0.18 [-0.01-0.38]) or use of analgesic medications (0.07 [-0.06-0.20]) and triptans (0.04 [-0.13-0.21]).

CONCLUSIONS

MBIs may…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,027 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free