Evidence Hub

Cognitive impairment in vestibular migraine: a PubMed-based systematic review and meta-analysis

Di M, Hu L, Li C, Yin X, Gui S, Han L

Frontiers in neurology, 2026

208 participants

Abstract

Background: Vestibular migraine (VM) is a leading cause of recurrent vertigo, and many patients describe cognitive symptoms such as "brain fog," slowed thinking, and forgetfulness; however, the magnitude and consistency of objectively measured cognitive impairment in VM have not been clearly quantified. We therefore conducted a PubMed-only systematic review (2010-2025; English; humans) of observational studies reporting quantitative behavioral cognitive outcomes or explicit impairment thresholds in adults with VM. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using ROBINS-I. Continuous outcomes were pooled as standardized mean differences (SMD; Hedges g; random-effects REML), while the prevalence of study-defined cognitive impairment in VM cohorts was synthesized using the Freeman-Tukey transformation; when required, medians and measures of dispersion were converted to means and standard deviations.

Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria, of which four contributed to the primary meta-analysis (VM n = 208; healthy controls [HC] n = 180). Compared with HC, adults with VM demonstrated poorer global cognition (SMD -0.92, 95% CI -1.13 to -0.70; I2 = 8%), with a prediction interval of -1.38 to -0.45. Executive function, indexed by Stroop performance in two studies, also suggested a large deficit (SMD + 1.55, 95% CI 0.77-2.33; I2 = 79%), though this pooled estimate should be interpreted cautiously as an exploratory signal due to the high…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 208 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free