Evidence Hub

Magnitude and Determinants of Placebo Response in Acute Migraine Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Makita LM, Katsuyama E, Christensen RH, Takeshima T, Ashina S, Piovesan EJ, Luna AM, Ueda GN et al.

Neurology, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Migraine is a highly prevalent and disabling neurologic disorder. Beyond drug-specific mechanisms, the role of contextual, individual-related, and disease-related factors remains poorly characterized. We quantified placebo response in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acute migraine treatments and identified patient-level, drug-level, and study-level determinants.

METHODS

This meta-analytic review searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the European and Japanese Trial Registers from inception to November 2025 for published/unpublished, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 2 or 3 RCTs evaluating acute pharmacologic migraine treatments. Placebo rates with 95% CIs and prediction intervals (PIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions explored potential drivers. The primary outcome was 2-hour pain freedom after placebo administration. Secondary outcomes included 2-hour pain relief, sustained pain freedom, rescue medication use, global impression of improvement, and most bothersome symptom (MBS) freedom.

RESULTS

We analyzed 126 RCTs published between 1991 and 2025, comprising 24,614 placebo-treated participants (mean age range, 34.8-45.2 years; female, 65.2%-96.9%). The pooled 2-hour pain freedom rate was 11% (95% CI 10%-12%; PI: 4%-27%). The highest estimates were observed for intranasal (14%; 95% CI 12%-16%) and subcutaneous (13%; 95% CI 8%-20%) administration, compared with oral…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free