Evidence Hub

Targeting TRPA1 antagonists for nociplastic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical evidence

Antoniazzi C, Brito HA, Rodrigues P, Vione Fim Y, Ruviaro NA, Machado AC, Trevisan G

European journal of pharmacology, 2026

Abstract

Nociplastic pain results from altered nociceptive processing without apparent tissue damage. Effective treatment remains challenging due to limited biomarker availability and poor response to conventional analgesics. Transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) is a promising molecular target because of its role in pain hypersensitivity and neuroinflammatory signaling. Preclinical studies indicate that TRPA1 antagonists reduce nociception in various nociplastic pain models. However, their therapeutic significance has not been systematically evaluated. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarize preclinical evidence regarding TRPA1 antagonists as modulators of nociplastic pain hypersensitivity. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025629227). A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified studies published from 2011 to 2024. Twelve in vivo rodent studies met the inclusion criteria, assessing TRPA1 antagonists in migraine-like nociception, chronic post-ischemia pain (CPIP), and reserpine-induced fibromyalgia models. Mechanical allodynia was the primary outcome. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2. Study quality ranged from low to moderate, with recent publications revealing improved reporting standards and reduced risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed that TRPA1 antagonists produced consistent antinociceptive effects across nociplastic pain models, reducing mechanical and cold…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free