Evidence Hub

Comparative efficacy of AAC and ibuprofen versus lasmiditan, ubrogepant, and rimegepant for the acute treatment of episodic migraine in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Mitra A, Franks B, Petruschke R, Dhiman A, Bansal N

Frontiers in neurology, 2026

22,100 participants

Abstract

Background: A range of pharmacologic options is available for acute migraine treatment, yet the efficacy and safety of commonly used over-the-counter (OTC) therapies relative to newer prescription agents remain unclear. Given the scarcity of direct head-to-head trials, this network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated selected OTC therapies against newer oral agents, including CGRP antagonists and the 5-HT1F receptor agonist.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL for RCTs of acute migraine therapies published between January 1990 and July 2025. Primary outcomes were 2-h (2 h) pain relief and pain freedom; secondary outcomes included 2-h photophobia, phonophobia and nausea. Effect sizes were calculated as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A frequentist NMA was conducted to estimate comparative efficacy and safety across the treatment network.

Results: This NMA synthesized evidence from 25 RCTs, including 5 different interventions across 19 dose categories, involving a total of 22,100 participants with migraine. Compared with placebo, acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine (AAC) combination showed superior 2 h pain relief (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.61-1.94; p-score = 0.96), followed by ibuprofen 400 mg and 200 mg. For 2 h pain freedom, AAC, ibuprofen 400 mg, and lasmiditan 200 mg showed broadly comparable favorable effects versus placebo, with similar RRs and p-scores. AAC also…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 22,100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free