Evidence Hub

Fremanezumab for migraine in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fernández-Bravo-Rodrigo J, Pascual-Morena C, Saz-Lara A, Martínez-García I, Lever-Megina CG, Patiño-Cardona S, Flor-García A, Cavero-Redondo I

Expert review of neurotherapeutics, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Although the efficacy of fremanezumab in treating migraine has been proven in randomized controlled trials, its effectiveness is not well understood. Consequently, this study purpose was to synthesize and estimate its real-world effectiveness and safety in patients with migraine.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was conducted from inception to November2025. Real-world studies evaluating fremanezumab effectiveness, measured by monthly migraine days (MMDs), monthly headache days (MHDs), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and related outcomes, including safety, were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed.

Results: One month after treatment initiation, fremanezumab reduced MMD by -5.82 days (95% CI: -6.67, -4.97), MHD by -7.30 days (95% CI: -9.72, -4.87) and HIT-6 scores by -6.84 points (95% CI: -10.30, -3.39). Approximately 50% of patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in MMD or MHD within 3 months, with response rates increasing progressively up to 12 months. Adverse event rates were 0.05 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.09) in 6 months and 0.07 (95% CI: 0.03, 0.12) in 12 months, with constipation being the most frequently reported event.

Conclusion: Fremanezumab is associated with clinically significant reductions in migraine frequency, disability and acute medication used in real-world settings, with a favorable safety profile.

Prospero: CRD42021266322.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free