Evidence Hub

CGRP-Targeting Therapies in Vestibular Migraine: A Synthesis of Observational Evidence with Direction-of-Effect Analysis

Ciubotaru A, Mastaleru A, Schreiner TG, Grosu C, Alexa D, Oancea A, Vamanu A, Roceanu AM et al.

Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

103 participants

Abstract

Background: Vestibular migraine (VM) is a common but underdiagnosed cause of episodic vertigo lacking evidence-based preventive treatments. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a central role in migraine pathogenesis and is expressed in vestibular structures, providing a rationale for CGRP-targeting therapies in VM. However, available evidence has not been systematically synthesized.

Methods: We conducted a structured synthesis of studies evaluating CGRP-targeting therapies (monoclonal antibodies and gepants) in adults with definite/probable VM. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, prospective/retrospective cohorts, and case series (≥10 patients) reporting quantitative outcomes. A two-tier synthesis was prespecified: quantitative meta-analysis where feasible, otherwise narrative synthesis with direction-of-effect analysis.

Results: Of 247 records, four observational studies met inclusion criteria (total N ≈ 103 patients). No RCTs were identified. All four studies evaluated CGRP monoclonal antibodies; no gepant studies met inclusion criteria. Outcome reporting was highly heterogeneous. Quantitative meta-analysis was not feasible. Direction-of-effect synthesis showed consistent improvement across all studies for vertigo frequency (4/4), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (2/2), and monthly migraine days (2/2). No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: CGRP monoclonal antibodies…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 103 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free