Evidence Hub

Rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Istoc M, Chaudhry BA, Christensen RH, Al-Khazali HM, Ashina M, Karlsson WK, Ashina H

The journal of headache and pain, 2026

6,734 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objective: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of a single 75 mg oral dose of rimegepant compared with placebo for the acute treatment of migraine attacks in adults.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, with the protocol prospectively registered in PROSPERO (Identifier: CRD420251042015). Comprehensive searches of CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, EUCTR, PubMed, and WHO ICTRP were performed from database inception to December 2025, without language restrictions. Supplementary sources were also reviewed, including regulatory and sponsor materials such as FDA and EMA submissions and entries in the Pfizer and Biohaven clinical trial registries. Eligible studies were double-blind randomized controlled trials enrolling adults (≥ 18 years) with migraine (with or without aura) who received a single 75 mg oral dose of rimegepant compared with placebo for the acute treatment of migraine attacks. The co-primary outcomes were pain freedom at 2 h post-dose and sustained pain freedom from 2 to 24 h post-dose. Tolerability outcomes included all non-serious adverse events (AEs) following dosing, whereas safety outcomes comprised serious adverse events. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was quantified using…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 6,734 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free