Evidence Hub

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Levels of Children and Adolescents With Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Zhu G, Yan G, Luo Y, Luo J

European journal of pain (London, England), 2026

5 citations

Abstract

Background and objective: Although calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has emerged as a promising therapeutic target in migraine management, current clinical evidence regarding its dynamic variations in paediatric migraine populations remains inconclusive. We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the relationship between blood CGRP levels and paediatric migraine.

Databases and data treatment: We systematically searched for observational studies that reported CGRP levels in paediatric migraine published in English from the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase electronic databases, or in Chinese from the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and the WanFang Med database. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The quality of evidence for each outcome was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation guidelines.

Results: Of the 1134 identified studies, eight were eligible for inclusion. There was a 'Moderate' level of evidence demonstrating significantly elevated CGRP levels in children with migraine compared to controls (standardised mean difference [SMD] = 1.44, 95% CI 0.61-2.31). Stratification analysis showed the 'Low' level of evidence revealed higher levels during both ictal (SMD = 2.39, 95% CI 0.59-4.19) and interictal phases (SMD = 1.27, 95% CI 0.54-1.99). 'Very low' quality of evidence supported paediatric migraine patients with (SMD = 1.47, 95% CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free