Evidence Hub

Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for chronic migraine with medication-overuse headache: a conservative meta-analysis

Makita LM, Carolino GDGDS, Souza YG, Brito HC, Oliveira M, Kojima GSA, Tomé MR, Monteiro JDS et al.

Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2026

3,094 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Chronic migraine (CM) is often complicated by medication-overuse headache (MOH), worsening disability. Although withdrawal of overused medications is recommended, adherence is poor and relapse is frequent. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway may offer an effective preventive option without requiring discontinuation, but current evidence is limited by few and heterogeneous randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Objective To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP mAbs in treating CM with MOH (CM + MOH) under a conservative approach. Methods The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for RCTs comparing anti-CGRP mAbs with placebo in adults with CM + MOH. The primary outcome was the mean change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) at 3 months. The secondary outcomes included acute medication use, disability, drug overuse resolution, response rate, and adverse events (AEs). Random-effects models with Sidik-Jonkman estimator and Knapp-Hartung adjustments pooled effect sizes. Results We included seven RCTs, totalling 3,094 patients. Anti-CGRP mAbs significantly reduced MMDs (mean difference [MD] = -0.35; 95%CI: -0.43 to -0.26) and acute medication use (MD = -0.35; 95%CI: -0.51 to -0.19) compared with placebo. Higher rates, of ≥ 50%, of response (risk ratio [RR] = 1.94; 95%CI: 1.60–2.34) and drug overuse resolution (RR = 1.38; 95%CI: 1.04–1.83) were observed, with no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,094 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free