Evidence Hub

Efficacy of cervical physical therapy on pain sensitivity in patients with migraine compared to no treatment, sham treatment or usual medical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Amons AL, Castien RF, De Hertogh W, Burchell GL, Schoonmade LJ, van der Wouden JC, Dekker J, van der Horst HE

The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2026

3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To examine the efficacy of cervical physical therapy (e.g. cervical mobilization, exercise, and myofascial treatments) on pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in patients with migraine, compared to no treatment, sham treatment, or usual medical care. Method A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase.com, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, Cinahl Plus and PEDro. Two independent reviewers assessed the selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE approach. The meta-analysis included PPTs from cervical muscles and cephalic muscles. Results Five papers out of 965 screened papers met our inclusion criteria, of which two originated from the same randomized controlled trial. Four RCTs had some risk of bias due to the absence of a pre-specified analysis plan and missing outcome data. One RCT had a high risk of bias due to a lack of information on concealment and blinding. All studies reported increased PPTs after cervical treatment. However, statistically significant differences were only found for the sternocleidomastoid muscle (mean difference (MD) 1.13 kg/cm2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48 to 1.78) and the frontal muscle (MD 0.53 kg/cm2; 95% CI: 0.07 to 1.00). The certainty of evidence was low to very low. Conclusion The efficacy of cervical physical therapy on PPTs is uncertain. More studies of high methodological quality…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free