Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for cluster headache: a systematic review and frequentist-Bayesian meta-analysis

Yuan L, Zhang YX, Kulachai P, Niu XY, Yu T, Zhang YD, Zheng H

Journal of neurology, 2026

655 participants

Abstract

Background: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies have transformed migraine prevention, but their efficacy in cluster headache remains uncertain.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov through February 28, 2026, for trials of CGRP monoclonal antibodies in cluster headache. The primary outcome was weekly cluster headache attack frequency, quantified as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals. Bayesian meta-analysis with five prior specifications and trial sequential analysis were conducted as prespecified sensitivity analyses.

Results: Four trials (655 participants) were included. The pooled MD was - 0.81 attacks per week (95%CI - 2.24 to 0.62; P = 0.265; I2 = 8%). Neither episodic (MD - 1.21; 95%CI - 5.20 to 2.78) nor chronic (MD - 0.93; 95%CI - 2.89 to 1.03) subgroups reached significance (P = 0.90). The odds ratio for 50% or greater responder rate was 1.39 (95%CI 0.88-2.19; P = 0.159); risk ratios reached significance (1.25; 95%CI 1.04-1.49; P = 0.017), a discrepancy driven by high placebo rates (27-53%). Bayesian analysis showed an 81.1% posterior probability of any benefit, but only 17.9% probability that the true reduction reached 2 or more attacks per week. Trial sequential analysis indicated that for an assumed effect of 2.5 attacks per week, accrued information exceeded the required information size (135.6%) without the cumulative Z-statistic crossing the efficacy boundary; for an…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 655 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free