Evidence Hub

Chronic pain and risk of cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies

Qiu D, Zhou ZB, Li XY, Hashimoto K, Yang JJ, Wang XM

Translational psychiatry, 2026

7,914,407 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Chronic pain is increasingly recognized as a potential risk factor for cognitive decline, yet findings from observational studies are inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the long-term association between chronic pain and cognitive impairment. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 2025 for longitudinal cohort studies assessing this relationship. Twenty-eight eligible cohorts comprising 7,914,407 participants were included. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using random-effects models; subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity. Chronic pain was associated with a higher risk of cognitive impairment (pooled adjusted OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.14-1.47), an effect driven by dementia (pooled OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.23-1.65) rather than by global cognitive performance scores (pooled OR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.88-1.11). Associations were stronger in studies with follow-up ≥5 years (OR = 1.37), in older populations (OR = 1.30), and in cohorts focusing on headache-related pain (OR = 1.42). Meta-regression indicated that depression was a key moderator of the association. These findings suggest that chronic pain is linked specifically to an increased risk of dementia, particularly among older individuals and those with headache-related pain. Integrative clinical strategies addressing pain and co-occurring depression, along with mechanistic and interventional studies using standardized…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,914,407 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free