Evidence Hub

2025 guideline update to acute treatment of migraine for adults in the emergency department: The American Headache Society evidence assessment of parenteral pharmacotherapies

Robblee J, Minen MT, Friedman BW, Cortel-LeBlanc MA, Cortel-LeBlanc A, Orr SL

Headache, 2026

20 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2016 American Headache Society (AHS) guideline on parenteral pharmacologic therapies for the management of migraine attacks in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the same methodology as the 2016 guideline. The original search strategy was repeated and expanded to include studies of nerve blocks and sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform through February 10, 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults diagnosed with migraine, treated in the ED with intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), subcutaneous (SC), or nerve block (including SPG block) interventions. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted using a standardized form and verified by a second reviewer. Risk of bias was assessed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria. Where applicable, meta-analyses were performed. Efficacy was categorized as highly likely, likely, or possibly effective or ineffective. Clinical recommendations were developed using the AAN guideline development process.

RESULTS: The search identified 26 new RCTs evaluating 20 injectable treatments. Of these, 12 were rated class I (low risk of bias), 9 class II, and 4 class III.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free