Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of CGRP monoclonal antibodies for cluster headache: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Muneer MA, Gupta I, Mansoor A, S P, Dey D, Rathi D, Rudrakumar M, Verma A et al.

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026

1,000 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Cluster headache (CH) is a severe unilateral trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia with limited well tolerated therapies. Calcitonin gene related peptide monoclonal antibodies, including galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab, have established efficacy in migraine and are under evaluation in CH. This study assesses their efficacy and safety using pairwise and network meta analysis.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through April 2025. Randomized controlled trials enrolling adults with episodic or chronic CH were included. The primary endpoint was change in weekly attack frequency. Secondary outcomes included subtype specific effects and adverse events. Frequentist random effects network meta analysis and pairwise meta analysis were performed in R.

Results: Five trials with approximately 1,000 participants were included. No agent demonstrated statistically significant reduction in weekly attack frequency versus placebo, although consistent numerical improvements were observed. Dose specific network estimates showed mean differences of - 0.81 for galcanezumab 300 mg, - 0.17 for eptinezumab 400 mg, 0.71 for fremanezumab 675/225 mg, and - 1.27 for fremanezumab 900/225 mg. Pooled dose estimates were - 0.81 for galcanezumab, - 0.27 for fremanezumab, and - 0.17 for eptinezumab. Pairwise meta analysis yielded a pooled mean difference of - 0.41. Subgroup analysis indicated minimal change in chronic CH and greater numerical reduction…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free