Evidence Hub

Distinct inflammatory profiles across migraine states: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Stuchfield-Denby E, Pereira B, Bouvier D, Dallel R, Moisset X

The journal of headache and pain, 2025

2,850 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

Background: Although several meta-analyses have emphasised the role of inflammation in migraine, none has accounted for the diversity of its clinical manifestations. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide a comprehensive and reliable assessment of cytokine levels in migraine.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane up to July 4-5, 2024. Original studies providing data on cytokine levels in migraine were included. Non-inclusion criteria covered studies on hemiplegic migraine, controls with tension-type headache, and unclear cytokine identification. The meta-analysis did not cover studies involving less than 10 participants per group or lacking accessible numeral data. Summary data were extracted from each study and pooled using a random-effects model. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated to compare cytokine levels across all relevant biological samples and comparison groups.

Findings: Fifty-seven studies were included in the narrative review and/or meta-analysis, covering 2850 migraine patients and 2814 controls. In episodic migraine patients versus controls, blood levels of interleukin-6 (SMD 0·36 [95% CI, 0.07; 0·64], P = 0·013, I²=74·0%), transforming growth factor β (SMD 0·68 [95% CI, 0·44; 0·93], P < 0·001, I²=0·0%) and C-X-C motif ligand 8 (narrative review) were elevated. Levels of interleukin-6 (narrative review; SMD 1·40 [95% CI, 0·95; 1·86], P < 0.001, I²=0·0%) and adiponectin (SMD 0·59 [95% CI, 0·19; 0·98], P…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,850 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free