Evidence Hub

Efficacy and optimal dosage of various exercises for migraine: a multilevel network and dose-response meta-analysis

Xie J, Lin Y, Wang B

PeerJ, 2025

1,611 participants

Abstract

Background: To elucidate the relative efficacy of diverse exercise modalities for migraine and quantify the optimal therapeutic dosage.

Method: A systematic search was conducted across four electronic databases from their inception to May 2025. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment. A multilevel network meta-analysis (ML-NMA) integrated with a dose-response analysis was employed to comprehensively compare these interventions.

Results: Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1,611) were included. The most effective interventions were combined aerobic+resistance exercise (g = - 1.85, 95% credible interval (CrI): [-2.53 to -1.18]; surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 0.91), followed by resistance exercise (g = - 1.45, 95% CrI [-1.79 to -1.10]; SUCRA = 0.81), yoga (g = - 0.35, 95% CrI [-0.63 to -0.06]; SUCRA = 0.49), and tai chi (g = - 0.48, 95% CrI [-0.91 to -0.05]; SUCRA = 0.46). The dose-response analysis identified an optimal therapeutic window of 300-600 metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-min/week, an intensity of 4.5-5.5 METs, and a duration of 8-10 weeks. The overall certainty of evidence was rated from very low to low.

Conclusion: Combined aerobic+resistance exercise, resistance exercise, tai chi, and yoga represent promising therapeutic options for migraine. The optimal dose was identified as approximately 70-135 minutes of moderate-intensity or 45-90 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity weekly,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,611 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free