Evidence Hub

Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Systemic Comorbidities in Patients With POTS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kulin D, Shah A, Fairlie T, Staller K, Nurko S, Keefer L, Aziz Q, Drossman DA et al.

Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2026

8,268 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) frequently report higher rates of chronic gastrointestinal symptoms, disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), and extra-intestinal co-morbidities. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and comorbid conditions in POTS patients.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched from inception until May 2025 for studies reporting gastrointestinal symptoms in POTS patients. A random-effects model was used to pool the proportion of POTS patients reporting gastrointestinal symptoms, and sub-group analyses were conducted.

Results: The final dataset includes 19 studies, with 8268 POTS patients, revealing that 57.9% (95% CI 38.4-75.2) had at least one gastrointestinal symptom. The most common gastrointestinal symptom was nausea (70.1%, 95% CI 51.5-83.7) followed by bloating (64.9%, 95% CI 48.5-78.4), abdominal pain (60.4%, 95% CI 39.2-78.3) and postprandial fullness (60.4%, 95% CI 45.6-73.6). Irritable bowel syndrome was the most prevalent DGBI, affecting 26.8% (95% CI 15.3-42.4) of POTS patients. The most common extraintestinal comorbidity was anxiety, reported in 42.9% (95% CI 22.7-65.8), followed by chronic fatigue (40.9%, 95% CI 21.1-64.2), migraine (35.6%, 95% CI 27.0-45.2), depression (34.4%, 95% CI 19.0-54.0), and fibromyalgia (21.6%, 95% CI 12.8-34.2). Approximately one third reported mast cell activation syndrome (36.3%, 95% CI 17.8-60.0)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 8,268 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free