Evidence Hub

Influence of greater occipital nerve block on the relief of acute migraine: A meta-analysis

Wenzhong Li, Liping Tang

Medicine, 2024

224 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Background: Greater occipital nerve (GON) block may help relieve acute migraine, and this meta-analysis aimed to investigate the influence of GON block on pain relief of acute migraine. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases, and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of GON block for acute migraine. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model regardless of the heterogeneity. Results: Four RCTs and 224 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with control intervention in acute migraine, GON block intervention could significantly reduce pain scores at 45 to 60 minutes (MD = −2.31; 95% CI = −3.08 to −1.53; P < .00001) and pain scores at 30 minutes (MD = −1.95; 95% CI = −2.61 to −1.29; P < .00001), but demonstrated no impact on pain scores at 0 to 15 minutes (MD = −0.46; 95% CI = −1.00 to 0.08; P = .09), sustained headache relief (OR = 1.46; 95% CI = 0.06–36.66; P = .82) or rescue medication (OR = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.01–19.16; P = .59). Conclusions: GON block intervention may be able to alleviate pain intensity for acute migraine patients.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 224 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free