Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of patent foramen ovale closure for mitigating migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies

T. Silalahi, T. Hariyanto

Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, 2024

17 citations

Abstract

Background: Although often asymptomatic, patent foramen ovale (PFO) may cause disabling migraine symptoms. Evidence regarding PFO closure for prevention of migraine is still ambiguous and conflicting. Objectives: This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of PFO closure for mitigating migraine symptoms. Design: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Data sources and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on the Scopus, Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases up until March 12, 2024. This review incorporates literature that examines the comparison between PFO closure and control with outcome data related to migraine. We employed random-effect models to analyze the standardized mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR) for presentation of the outcomes. Results: A total of five RCTs and six observational studies were incorporated. The results of our meta-analysis showed higher reduction of monthly migraine attacks from baseline (SMD −0.34; 95% CI: −0.51, −0.18, p < 0.0001, I2 = 19%) and monthly migraine days from baseline (SMD −0.30; 95% CI: −0.53, −0.08, p = 0.009, I2 = 0%) among PFO closure than control. However, the complete resolution of migraine (especially based on the evidence from RCTs; p = 0.24), HIT-6 score (p = 0.08), and MIDAS score (p = 0.15) did not differ significantly between two groups of intervention. The majority of adverse events reported were atrial…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free