Evidence Hub

Cervical musculoskeletal impairments in migraine and tension-type headache and relationship to pain related factors: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Chalomjai Pensri, Zhi-Qi Liang, J. Treleaven, G. Jull, Lucy C. Thomas

Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 2024

2,551 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An updated systematic review of cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction in migraine and tension-type headache is needed. Influencing factors (pain hypersensitivity with cervical musculoskeletal testing, active trigger points and tenderness) have not been investigated.

OBJECTIVES

To i) update evidence for cervical musculoskeletal impairments in migraine and tension-type headache ii) report on accompanying pain associated with testing, active trigger points and tenderness in headache; iii) determine relationships between these sensitivity features and cervical musculoskeletal impairments in headache.

METHODS

Five databases were searched for observational studies. Quality of studies was assessed with JBI Critical Appraisal. Meta-analysis was performed using random effect models. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven studies were included comprising 2551 participants. New findings in migraine were increased forward head posture in standing (MD = -2.51°[-4.94°, -0.09°]), reduced flexion/rotation range (MD = -9.47°[-15.78°, -3.16°]), reduced flexor strength (Std. MD = -0.34[-0.57, -0.10]) and endurance (MD = -14.37[-28.15, -0.58]), and reduced extensor strength (Std. MD = -0.34[-0.60, -0.08]) in migraine. Tension-type headache had reduced extensor strength (Std. MD = -0.45[-0.85, -0.04]). Certainty was very low for all findings due to heterogeneity and small effect size. Active trigger points and tenderness were common, particularly, in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,551 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free