Evidence Hub

Drug interventions for acute treatment of pediatric migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Cheng Y, Li J, Liu L, Li G

Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026

8,914 participants

Abstract

Background: Migraine in children and adolescents not only impacts academic pursuits and family life but also have secondary psychological effects. Determining the role of acute medication for migraine treatment in this population can reduce the burden associated with migraine. This network meta-analysis aimed to identify the relative efficacy and safety of acute migraine drug in children and adolescents migraine populations.

Methods: The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and MEDLINE via PubMed and Embase databases were searched from inception to August 2025, only published studies in English. Double-blind randomized clinical trials evaluating the currently available acute treatments for childhood and adolescent migraines were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was pain freedom at 2 hours. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the proportion of participants with pain relief at 2 hours, pain freedom from two to 24 h, and the proportion using rescue drugs after 2 hours and up to 24 h. Adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated.

Results: The analysis included 30 studies (involving 8,914 participants and 13 pharmacological interventions). All treatments included demonstrated higher odds ratios (ORs) compared with the placebo for pain freedom at 2 hours. Dihydroergotamine was associated with the highest ORs, but its confidence interval included null values. Sumatriptan/naproxen sodium, ibuprofen, zolmitriptan nasal spray, sumatriptan nasal spray, and rizatriptan showed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 8,914 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free