Evidence Hub

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of rimegepant for migraine

An T, Duan X, Liu Y, Chuang J, Liu J, Shi W, Liu Z

Frontiers in neurology, 2026

2,850 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Migraine is a prevalent neurological condition, affecting approximately 14% of the population, and is a leading cause of disability. Conventional treatments may have limited efficacy and tolerability limitations in clinical practice. Rimegepant is approved for the dual indications of managing acute migraine episodes and preventing migraine attacks. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rimegepant in migraine treatment.

Method: A systematic search of public databases from their inception until February 2025 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials for evaluating the efficacy of rimegepant in migraine treatment. The overall estimate was derived using the 95% confidence interval (CI) and risk ratio (RR) in a random-effects model. GRADEprofiler was employed to assess the quality of evidence. The Cochrane Collaboration was utilized to evaluate the risk of bias.

Results: Our investigation reviewed 5 studies, which included 2,715 individuals treated with rimegepant and 2,850 control participants. Patients treated with rimegepant had statistically significant pain relief (RR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.27-1.41; p I 2 = 0%) and freedom from Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) 2 h after treatment (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.28-1.49; p I 2 = 0%). However, the initial therapeutic success with rimegepant does not correlate with a sustained lack of pain relapse from 2 h to 48 h (RR = 1.16; 95% CI 0.99-1.37; p > 0.05; I 2 = 0%). There was no statistically…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,850 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free