Evidence Hub

Corneal nerve alterations in migraine: a systematic review of in vivo confocal microscopy and esthesiometry findings

Mejía-Salgado G, Tello A, Galvis V, Vergara-Arenas D, Forero-Vargas C, de-la-Torre A, Galor A

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association, 2026

370 participants

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate structural and functional alterations of the subbasal corneal nerve plexus (SBCNP) in adults with migraine using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) and corneal sensitivity testing, and to explore differences according to migraine subtype.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Ovid, LILACS, VHL, and MedRxiv were searched through May 24, 2025, for studies assessing IVCM or corneal sensitivity in adults with migraine. Eligible designs included case-control and cross-sectional studies. Outcomes included corneal total branch density (CTBD), nerve fiber density (NFD), nerve fiber length (NFL), nerve branch density (NBD), tortuosity coefficient (TC), and corneal sensitivity. Risk of bias was assessed using tools designed for each study type, and Certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE framework adapted to observational studies. Due to substantial methodological heterogeneity across studies, including differences in IVCM acquisition protocols, image analysis software, and mathematical definitions of nerve parameters, findings were synthesized narratively. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251105525).

Results: Eight studies, including 370 participants with migraine, met eligibility criteria. Most studies evaluating chronic migraine populations reported lower CTBD, NFD, and NFL compared with healthy controls, although findings remained heterogeneous across studies. Studies of episodic migraine showed contradictory findings, including…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 370 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free