Evidence Hub

Sex-specific management of migraine a systematic review and consensus statement from the European Headache Federation (EHF)

Braca S, Casillo F, Moreira S, Ekizoglu E, Bjork MH, Szewczyk AK, Van Dycke A, Uluduz D et al.

The journal of headache and pain, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Migraine burden is over twice as high among females than males. Although sex differences are recognized in migraine, robust sex-specific guidance for management remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and synthesize current evidence on sex-related clinical differences in migraine, including treatment outcomes and reproductive management, and to provide evidence-based or expert consensus recommendations where high-quality data are lacking. METHODS: A systematic literature review using the PICO framework addressed 24 sex-specific questions across three domains: (1) biological sex differences across the lifespan, (2) sex-specific variations in treatment outcomes, and (3) fertility and reproduction-related management. To address anticipated evidence gaps, a structured Delphi consensus process complemented the review. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251058438). RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies informed 10 evidence summaries. Acute and preventive anti-CGRP therapies seem to show similar efficacy between sexes. For menstrual-related migraine attacks (MM), triptans and lasmiditan are effective, with frovatriptan being recommended for short-term prevention; long-term prevention include topiramate and anti-CGRP mAbs. In pregnancy triptans, greater occipital nerve (GON) blocks, and onabotulinumtoxinA are safe, with GON blocks showing potential efficacy. During breastfeeding, triptans appear to be safe. Anti-CGRP mAbs are equally effective in pre and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free