Evidence Hub

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy during migraine attacks: A systematic review

Radutiu DI, Szabo E, Christensen RH, Ratai EM, Hadjikhani N, Al-Khazali HM, Ashina M, Ashina H

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2026

Abstract

BackgroundThe neurobiological basis of migraine remains incompletely understood. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) allows non-invasive quantification of neurochemical and metabolic patterns in the brain, offering unique insights into biochemical processes during distinct migraine phases. This systematic review provides a critical appraisal of existing evidence describing MRS-derived neurochemical and metabolic alterations during spontaneous and experimentally provoked migraine attacks.MethodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement and prospectively registered in PROSPERO. Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were performed from database inception through August 1, 2025. Eligible studies included observational or interventional investigations acquiring 1H-MRS or 31P-MRS data during the ictal phase in adults with migraine, incorporating either non-ictal comparisons or healthy controls. Considerable variability in study design, brain regions, and metabolite outcomes precluded quantitative synthesis, necessitating a structured qualitative analysis organized by MRS technique and anatomical region.ResultsEight studies published between 1988 and 2022 met inclusion criteria, comprising five 1H-MRS investigations and three 31P-MRS studies, some of which derived from overlapping participant cohorts. Brain regions examined included occipital cortex, pons, frontal cortex, basal ganglia, and parieto-occipital areas. In individual…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free