Evidence Hub

Shedding light on pain management: a translational systematic review of light therapy for the treatment of chronic pain

Taccardi D, Gowdy HGM, Sharp EV, Adya P, Cupido TL, Pagé MG, Ghasemlou N

EBioMedicine, 2026

Abstract

Background: Pharmacological options remain the primary approach for chronic pain management; however, alternative multimodal interventions are necessary. Light therapy, which can modulate circadian (24-h) rhythms, has been increasingly explored as a potential treatment for chronic pain; yet, its efficacy and underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This systematic review summarises evidence on photoreceptor-mediated light therapy for chronic pain in clinical and preclinical studies.

Methods: Four databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) were searched for studies published up to August 29, 2025. Eligible studies evaluated the effects of light therapy on chronic pain outcomes; risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for clinical populations and the SYRCLE tool for animal models. Studies involving light acting directly on the site of injury or skin were excluded. Outcomes related to pain were synthesised descriptively due to heterogeneity in study designs and interventions. This review was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42023429231).

Findings: Of 7757 studies screened, 18 studies were included (11 clinical and 7 preclinical). Overall, light therapy was associated with improvements in pain-related outcomes. However, the findings were inconsistent, particularly when dim-light (low intensity illumination) conditions were used as controls. Evidence was limited by methodological heterogeneity, unclear risk of bias in most preclinical studies,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free