Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Multiple Health Outcomes in Neurological Disorders: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials

Ye T, Shuai Y, Liu Y, Liu S, Tang X, Tian W, Zhang Y, Kong Y

Journal of integrative neuroscience, 2026

7,160 participants

Abstract

Background: Neurological disorders are a leading cause of disability worldwide. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising therapeutic tool for neurological disorders. However, a consensus on clinical recommendations for using tDCS in patients with neurological disorders is lacking. In this umbrella review, we aimed to establish evidence-based guidance for using tDCS to treat neurological disorders.

Methods: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were systematically searched to identify and evaluate existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the use of tDCS for neurological disorders. Quality was assessed using the Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) and the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects model was employed for reanalysis.

Results: A total of 17 systematic reviews and meta-analyses encompassing 358 randomized controlled trials and 7160 participants were analyzed. tDCS demonstrated efficacy across seven distinct health conditions, including stroke, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, cerebellar ataxia, fibromyalgia, disorders of consciousness, and migraine. Adverse effects were rarely reported, with the exception…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,160 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free