Evidence Hub

Steroids for preventing recurrence of acute severe migraine headaches: a meta-analysis

Huang Y, Cai X, Song X, Tang H, Huang Y, Xie S, Hu Y

European journal of neurology, 2013

905 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recurrence of migraine headaches after treatment is common. The evidence regarding steroids for preventing migraine headache recurrence is controversial. This meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of steroids for prevention of recurrent headaches.

METHODS: Databases (PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library) and conference proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing steroids and placebo in the treatment of migraine headaches. Two independent reviewers assessed studies and extracted data. Relative risks (RRs) of headache recurrence and adverse events were calculated and reported with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

RESULTS: Eight studies with 905 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed that when steroids were added to standard abortive therapy they reduced the rate of moderate or severe headache recurrence after 24-72 h of follow-up evaluation (RR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.59-0.86). There was no significant benefit of steroids compared with placebo in the proportion of totally resolved migraines (RR = 1.11; 95% CI = 0.94-1.32). The side effects of steroids are mild and not significant except for dizziness. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that parenteral dexamethasone tends to be more effective in reducing moderate or severe recurrent headaches (RR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.55-0.84). However, no significant differences were found between oral administration and parenteral administration of steroids (P = 0.37).

CONCLUSION: When…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 905 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free