Evidence Hub

Psychological transdiagnostic factors and migraine characteristics as predictors of migraine-related disability

Fox J, Gaul C, Ohse J, Peperkorn N, Krutzki J, Shiban Y

The journal of headache and pain, 2025

158 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent primary headache disorder that significantly impairs daily life. Research on factors contributing to migraine-related disability remains limited, particularly from a biopsychosocial perspective. This study investigated whether transdiagnostic psychological factors, as proposed by the Fear Avoidance Model (FAM), contribute to migraine-related disability beyond migraine symptoms.

METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis of selected baseline data from an ongoing randomized controlled trial, data from N = 158 individuals with migraine reporting ≥ 4 migraine days per month were examined. Data was collected through an online survey, including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as responses to standardized questionnaires (DASS, PCS, FAMI, HIT-6). A hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis was conducted, including independent variables in two blocks: (1) sociodemographic factors and migraine symptoms, and (2) FAM factors (pain catastrophizing, fear of attacks, depressiveness). Disability, the dependent variable, was assessed using the HIT-6 questionnaire. Additionally, mediation analyses were conducted to investigate the potential mediating role of pain catastrophizing in the relationship between pain intensity or attack frequency and disability.

RESULTS: A total of N = 158 participants were included in the analysis. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that sociodemographic and migraine symptoms accounted for 49% of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 158 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free