Evidence Hub

A human trigeminovascular biomarker for antimigraine drugs: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with sumatriptan

Ibrahimi K, Danser A, Terwindt GM, van den Meiracker AH, MaassenVanDenBrink A

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2017

11 participants

Abstract

Current antimigraine drugs are believed, besides their direct vasoconstrictive effect, to inhibit calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) release from trigeminal nerve endings during migraine. Objective The objective of this report is to establish a biomarker for the CGRP-interfering effect of antimigraine drugs. Methods We quantified the effect of sumatriptan on the trigeminal nerve-mediated rise in forehead dermal blood flow (DBF), induced by capsaicin application (0.6 mg/ml) and electrical stimulation (0.2-1.0 mA), in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy male ( n = 11, age ± SD: 29 ± 8 years) and female ( n = 11, 32 ± 7 years) individuals. Results DBF responses to capsaicin were attenuated by sumatriptan (ΔDBF, mean ± SEM: 82 ± 18 AU, p = 0.0002), but not by placebo (ΔDBF: 21 ± 12 AU, p = 0.1026). Conclusion We demonstrated that sumatriptan inhibits increases in DBF, induced by the release of, most likely, CGRP. Thus, our model may be used as a biomarker to establish the trigeminovascular effects of (potential) antimigraine drugs, such as CGRP receptor antagonists or antibodies directed against CGRP or its receptor.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free