Evidence Hub

Longitudinal Outcomes of Bilateral and Unilateral Proximal Greater Occipital Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency in Migraine: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Dadali S, Sahutoglu Bal N, Sabuncu U, Babaoglu G, Costu A, Babaoglan H, Yilmaz MC, Celik S et al.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026

187 participants

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Greater occipital nerve pulsed radiofrequency (GON-PRF) is an effective neuromodulatory treatment for migraine; however, evidence directly comparing unilateral and bilateral approaches remains limited. This prospective randomized controlled trial compared the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided proximal GON-PRF performed unilaterally versus bilaterally at the C2 level in patients with migraine. Materials and Methods: A total of 187 patients were randomized to receive unilateral (n = 91) or bilateral (n = 96) ultrasound-guided proximal GON-PRF without concomitant local anesthetic or corticosteroids. Per-protocol analyses included 78 and 88 participants in the unilateral and bilateral groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the change in monthly headache days (MHD) from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, acute medication days (AMD), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) grades, and Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scores. Longitudinal outcomes were analyzed using multivariable Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). Results: Of the 187 randomized participants, 166 completed the 6-month follow-up and were included in the per-protocol analysis. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in all outcomes throughout follow-up (all p < 0.001). At month 6, the Bilateral Group showed lower MHD values (median [IQR]: 7.0 [6.0] vs. 10.0 [6.0], p = 0.030), a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 187 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free