Evidence Hub

Calcitonin gene-related peptide induces headache attacks in people with idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Yiangou A, Do TP, Mollan SP, Thaller M, Mitchell JL, Mugo CW, Tsermoulas G, Hill LJ et al.

Brain : a journal of neurology, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a key mediator in migraine pathophysiology. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) headache phenotype is now understood to be typically migraine-like, but it is unclear whether CGRP directly provokes IIH headaches or alters intracranial pressure (ICP) dynamics. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover trial to address this. Twenty women with IIH and no prior migraine were randomly assigned to receive a 20-min continuous intravenous infusion of CGRP (1.5 μg/min) or placebo (isotonic saline). The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of participants who developed a provoked headache attack between CGRP and placebo during the 12 h observation after infusion. Secondary outcomes included the area under the curve (AUC) for headache intensity from -10 min to 12 h, the timing and duration of headache features, and baseline-adjusted changes for vital signs, cerebrovascular haemodynamics and ICP. Seventeen participants with mean age (standard deviation) 26.7 (6.4) years completed both visits. Twelve (71%) participants developed a typical IIH headache attack with migraine-like features after CGRP compared with three (18%) after placebo (risk difference 53%; 95% confidence interval, 26-79; P = 0.004). The AUC-10min-12h for headache intensity was higher after CGRP than after placebo (P = 0.016). The mean ICP remained unchanged, whereas ICP amplitude increased significantly after CGRP (P =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free