Evidence Hub

Efficacy of ophthalmic tetracaine for acute migraine relief: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial in the emergency department

Jafari M, Mellat A, Ezzabadi AR, MohammadKarimi N, Abarghouei SA, Kheirandish M, Zeinali N F

Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of ophthalmic tetracaine for treating migraine headaches in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, ninety patients were randomly assigned to two groups: ophthalmic tetracaine (0.5 mg/mL), vs placebo (artificial tear), both of which were administered by a blinded resident. Headache intensity was measured via a visual analog scale (VAS) before treatment and at 1-, 3-, and 5-minutes post-administration, with patients monitored for six hours for efficacy and side effects.

Results: Ninety patients were enrolled, with no significant baseline differences between groups. Mean pain scores were similar at baseline (8.80 ± 1.52 vs. 7.00 ± 2.43; P = 0.46) but were significantly lower in the tetracaine group at 1 min (5.28 ± 2.71 vs. 7.33 ± 2.46), 3 min (4.53 ± 3.53 vs. 7.31 ± 2.45), and 5 min (4.13 ± 3.20 vs. 7.28 ± 2.42) (all P < 0.001). Blurred vision (37.7% vs. 2.2%) and eye irritation (82.2% vs. 4.4%) were more frequent with tetracaine, while other adverse events were similar between groups.

Conclusions: Although ophthalmic tetracaine was associated with a rapid reduction in migraine pain intensity in this study, the findings should be interpreted cautiously given the small sample size, incomplete patient blinding, and short follow-up period. While these results suggest a potential role for tetracaine as an early adjunctive therapy in the emergency setting, further large-scale,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free