Evidence Hub

Efficacy of digital therapeutic sinCephalea for personalised nutrition versus control for migraine prevention: A 12-week open-label randomised clinical trial

Evers S, Grube HCB, Gendolla A, Gaul C, Ewald K, Witt O, Voggel J, Nitschke M et al.

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2026

842 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background Low-glycaemic diet may alleviate migraine; however, individual blood glucose variability can affect efficacy. In this open-label randomised controlled trial in Germany, we assessed whether the digital therapeutic (DTx) sinCephalea, which delivers personalised low-glycaemic nutritional recommendations supported by intermittent continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), reduces migraine frequency compared with a design-matched control application. Methods This open-label trial in Germany assessed the DTx sinCephalea for migraine prevention. Adults aged 18–65 years with episodic migraine were randomised 1:1 (in addition to standard treatment) to the digital therapeutic (intervention) or a design-matched control application. Patients completed a daily headache and medication diary, and 4-weekly patient-reported outcome questionnaires. Adherence to nutritional recommendations was monitored. Primary endpoint (Week 12): change from baseline in monthly migraine days (every 4 weeks) for intervention versus control. Secondary endpoints: change from baseline in monthly migraine days in patients with ≥50% adherence to nutritional recommendations, 30% response rates, migraine- and headache-related impairment, quality-of-life, and acute medication use for intervention versus control. Adverse events were recorded. Results 842 patients were randomised between July 2021 and August 2023 (full analysis set: intervention = 416; control = 419). There were significantly greater reductions in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 842 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free