Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in adults with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache who also received patient education: 24-week results of the randomized RESOLUTION trial

Schytz HW, Jensen RH, Lundqvist C, Tassorelli C, Vernieri F, Lantéri-Minet M, Terwindt GM, Blumenfeld A et al.

The journal of headache and pain, 2026

608 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: The phase 4 RESOLUTION trial showed that the first 12 weeks of treatment with eptinezumab, an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody, reduced migraine frequency, severity, and disease burden, and improved quality of life (QOL) versus placebo in participants with chronic migraine (CM) and medication-overuse headache (MOH) who also received patient education. Here, we present 24-week eptinezumab efficacy and safety in the RESOLUTION trial.

Methods: RESOLUTION was a randomized, parallel-group, multinational clinical trial that included a 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period and a 12-week open-label extension period (OLE). Adults (18-75 years) with CM and MOH (excluding opioid-overuse headache) received a brief educational intervention about MOH at baseline and were randomized (1:1) to IV eptinezumab 100 mg or placebo. At Week 12, all participants received eptinezumab 100 mg. Measures used for primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints were also captured during the OLE: mean changes from baseline in monthly migraine days (primary endpoint: Weeks 1-4), monthly headache days, monthly days with acute medication use, average daily pain, and participants no longer meeting threshold criteria for CM nor MOH. Secondary endpoints (including patient-reported-outcomes [PROs] assessing disease-related burden and health-related QOL) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were also captured during the OLE.

Results: Of 608 participants…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 608 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free