Evidence Hub

Migraine induced by vascular KATP channel activation is independent of HCN channel activity: A randomised controlled trial with translational validation

Zhuang ZA, Thuraiaiyah J, Kokoti L, Moreno RD, Gozalov E, Hakimzadeh Z, Al-Karagholi MA, Clement A et al.

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2026

31 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether blockade of hyperpolarisation-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels modifies migraine induced by activation of vascular ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels. Methods We conducted a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study in adults with migraine without aura. On two separate days, participants received intravenous levcromakalim followed immediately by either oral ivabradine or placebo in a balanced order. The primary endpoint was the 12-h incidence of levcromakalim-induced migraine. Secondary endpoints included the area under the curve (AUC) for headache intensity and haemodynamic responses. Parallel preclinical experiments were performed in a validated mouse model using von Frey-based tactile sensitivity to assess whether ivabradine, given as pretreatment or as rescue medication, alters levcromakalim-induced hypersensitivity. Results Twenty seven of 31 individuals completed the human study and provided data for the final analysis. Ivabradine did not modify the incidence of levcromakalim-induced migraine (22 of 27 after ivabradine and 22 of 27 after placebo; P > 0.99) or the AUC for headache intensity (P = 0.11). Haemodynamic responses did not differ between study days. In mice, ivabradine at multiple doses neither prevented nor reversed tactile hypersensitivity induced by repeated levcromakalim administration. Conclusions HCN channel blockade does not influence migraine or nociceptive…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 31 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free