Evidence Hub

Cognitive behaviour therapy tailored to migraine in multiple sclerosis: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Thevar P, Wong D, Hutton E, Alpitsis R, Malpas C, McIlroy A

Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 2026

31 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

ABSTRACT Approximately 50% of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have comorbid migraine. This pilot randomized controlled trial examined the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a five-week cognitive behaviour therapy targeted to treating migraine in RRMS (CBT-MMS). Participants with RRMS and ≥3 migraine days per month (MMD) received CBT-MMS or a nine-week waitlist. Feasibility was assessed by rates of retention, follow-up and outcome responses. Candidate primary outcomes were MMD, migraine duration, and pain intensity at baseline, post-treatment, and one-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included mood, fatigue, self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, disability and quality of life. Data were analyzed through multilevel modelling. Participants were 31 adults aged 22–59 with 8.32 ± 6.12 MMD at baseline. The retention rate was 96.77%. From baseline, the CBT-MMS group (n=21) had significantly fewer MMD and shorter migraine duration (in hours) at post-treatment (EMM=3.05 days, 95%CI [−5.32, −2.13]; EMM=6.34 h, 95%CI [−10.62, −5.15], respectively) and follow-up (EMM=2.82 days, 95%CI [−5.58, −2.33]; EMM=7.20 h, 95%CI [−9.64, −4.39], respectively). The waitlist group (n=10) had no such within-group changes. Treatment gains were found for anxiety, self-efficacy, and migraine-related disability, and no effects were found on remaining outcomes. These findings provide preliminary support for the feasibility and efficacy potential of CBT-MMS, warranting a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 31 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free